So Much Media, So Little News

So untold knowledge, so teeny Idea The disease of new-fangled media has greatly shrink human minds that preventive off on more and more hatful in this technology-accelerating valet de chambre at present. Daily life nowadays has signifi ignoret changed compare to hug drug years ago that office workers employ to waiting for sub track by reading a daily wordpaper, housewives seating at balcony and reading a composition in the morning. But now, most concourse read news on their cellophane or television instead Of newspaper.What is clash off on their behavior? Peter Fun who is an pop-deed writer for the New York Times, writes astir(predicate) polysyllable on his essay So much media, So Little nevus. Neal Gabbler who is a journalist and culture historian, writes about the relationship between bountiful brain and post-idea world. On his essay The Elusive Big Idea, he argues that people dont apportion as much about ideas as they used to be. The connection between the two aut hors has one of the most heavy reasons that new media gradually twisted the square value of newspaper that smother forged ideas.Thus, in order to correct the twisted value that media are rubbing off on news, the society needs to redefine the value of news and reexamine the concept of big ideas. The broadsheets offered daily coverage by publication company, but no commentator or analyst gave any scene and readers were left to make up their own minds. Peter Punt believes that on that point is barely people would create ideas on news, men sad law is that while whatsoever of us are naturally curious about what we don t know, an increasing number of readers and viewers want single reinforcement of what they already know. Pig. 1 98) Newspapers believed that their prime duty was to report what had happened the anterior day and give a space to reader a way to think, to brainstorm rather than make argument to an event or say on someone that post online. Were newspapers then better or worse? Certainly, they seem calmer, just followed a formula that required true tommyrot rather then come along with a high fictitious character argument to rub off on reader and offer them a ready-made idea.Neal Gabbler argues a social fact that people loss spot to create ideas in his say, Its not because we are dumber than our forebears but because we just dont care as much about ideas as they did. In effect, we are supporting in an increasingly post-idea world that few people are generating them and fewer outlets are disseminating them, the Internet notwithstanding(Pig 533) New media offers a way that what people can get idea from others immediately. Post-idea is a shortcut to make someone get going lazy without thinking or taking advantage of technology as the modern science to make unceasing progress.But more and more people choose new media in order to save effort and conceptualise a quick result, which is called the culture of instant gratification. New media provi des a dissolute way to help them to get to know the others opinion of news instantly. Obliviously, newspaper is a better choice to help people create idea and prompt advance of society. Although 24-hour radio news stations had been established, TV equivalents were some years away. The pages may beget been fewer, but the number of news stories was, if anything, passably higher than in todays papers.Peter r-nut argues that people pay less attention on on what they not use up, todays boutique media allow many people to pretermit news altogether. You can set your Internet home page so that it serves up only what youre interested in. (pig 97) New media has diversity format of news, video, audio recording and fancy advertisement catches peoples attention. Fun is pointing out a very important social trend in how people approach news media although they have the same nostalgia for the old days. People are seeking out information that confirms their own beliefs and interests as oppose d to seeking to be informed.This creates curt views of the world resulting in corrupting. The prevalence of more and more information isolation is one of the causes of divisiveness. Like what Fun said the best prescription has invariably been a combination of what Want to know and what we Ought to know. Neal Gabbler proposes the reason why people would pay more attention on new media, It keeps us in the loop, and keeps us connected to our friends and our cohort. Ideas are too airy, too impractical, too much work for too little reward. Few talk ideas. Everyone talks information, normally personal information. (534). New media takes more advantages from newspaper that could direct to readers mind. Newspaper lock away has a strong positive influence on both rotate information and help inspire peoples ideas, but the effect was less overwhelming. This was not just because newspapers had fewer intemperate columnists. It was also because even the miners strike did not dominate page af ter page, creating a kind of emotional tsunami, as a similar issue might now. On the broadsheets particularly, width of coverage counted are more than PPTP of report.People have come to learn more and more and to be given more definite ideas about less and less. We recognise in a golden era of information when you dont have to passively rely on the news sellers but can go directly to the source yourself. New media effectively endows us with common eyes, ears, and brain. People should not blindly believe some rumored event occurred as described. Anything remotely of interest is available permanently available for anyone curious enough to look for its true different big idea.