Research Paper on Juvenile Court Essay

Age is fair(a) a Number, honest?In the year 1993, a 2-year- gaga countersign, named Jamie Bulger was taken by two 10-year octogenarian boys and was injured and murdered. The two boys rested his body on a hale track with the intention of blaming the train, which would cover up what they had done (Wilde 1). Cameron Kocher a 9 year old from upstate Pennsylvania shot a strip down out of the window of his room and killed his 7-year-old neighbor, who was riding on a ride (Schwartz 1). Shocking isnt it? Who would trust children at much(prenominal) a four-year-old age could commit such crimes. The real question is what happened to these possibilitys? Do both(prenominal) children sw eachow the death penalisation? And if non, what punishment do they receive? Should teenages get trialed as growns? That question has haunted many for decades now. But before we imprint any irrational decisions, lets get to the facts. What exactly is a fresh delinquent? Well its a child who commi ts acts that would be considered crimes if done by an adult. A child is considered a juvenile delinquent until they reach the of 18, 17 some states 16 (Britannica 1). Juvenile delinquency flush toilet include crimes like disorderly conduct, minor theft, rape and vandalism (Britannica 1).Juveniles atomic number 18 usually tried in Juvenile Courts or also cognize as Family lawcourts. The purpose of juvenile courts is to rehabilitate a delinquent and prevent from repeating behavior, instead of sentencing them to confine. The systems rooted in the belief that children have not matured entirely to be aw ar of their mistakes/actions ( Leora). However juvenile courts didnt always exist. It wasnt until in Chicago 1899 the juvenile court of rectitude was started. Before this new system, children would be trialed as adults (Britannica 1). One of the very offset juvenile aspects was in 1786 in colonial times. Children under the age of septette could not be held guilty for a serious c rime. From the ages 8-14 it was said that their legal status was ambiguous. If you were over the age of 14 you would be trialed as an adult (Jeffrey 16 & 17). The use up for a juvenile system wasnt looked upon because before the behavior of children was the primary responsibility of the pargonnts, set outicularly the father. The community frowned upon those who could not control their children. When juveniles would go to a judge, the judge would just send them to jail for a short while, most of them would return.The idea or system of trialing a juvenile different from an adultdidnt come until the 1900s (Jeffery 17). As the system was created they needed to make some regulations or rules for certain occasions. Offenders who were charged with a particular serious crime will go cracking to a fitness hearing instead of having a juvenile court jurisdiction. A fitness hearing decides weather they should be trialed as an adult or juvenile. When making the decision they look at the mi nors degrees of condemnable sophistication, if they fire be rehabilitated and the juveniles previous cases (Leora 6). Other situations a juvenile may be trialed in an adult be when state laws authority such processing for certain offenses with a set age and rabidness statutory exclusion prosecutors decide on a crook proceeding with limitations based on offense and age prosecutorial discretion and the juvenile court judge decides to waive the case within limits based on offenses and age judicial waver (Britannica 3). A big bother was the punishment. What would be an efficient way? Courts wanted to avoid the death penalty and jail time. In the 1890s a juvenile could be sentenced to a death penalty. It wasnt until 2005 when in the U. S. Supreme Court decided to grow the age for the death penalty to 18 in the Roper v. Simmons case (Britannica 3). In Georgia the death penalty age is 17 (Jeffery 17). another(prenominal) regulation that was placed, that the court cannot make a ju risdiction that passes the age of 21. No matter what the offense is, juveniles argon to be released at 21.However if the juvenile is trialed in an adult court, than this condition wont apply (Britannica 4). So what is an in force(p) way to cooperate these juveniles? Family courts created all kinds of programs and activities. Such as, education based programs that help educate children about the affect of drugs, gangs, sex and weapons (Juvenile 3). This program helps p bents in monitoring and responding to a childs behavior (Britannica 1). There are correctional programs known commonly as training schools. Also at that place are presentational programs. An interpreter of one of these programs is Nebraska Correctional spring chicken facility. They have juvenile delinquents that have been trialed in an adult court. The age ranges from 15 to 21. They teach the youth how to change their criminal behavior (juvenile 4). Other solutions for juvenile delinquency are recreational program s.Theyre effective because they fill unsupervised hours after school. It has been reported that youths are most seeming commit a crime from 2pm to 8pm. Recreational programs allow youths to becomefriends with adults and children that are good influences (Juvenile 3). However there are many idle programs. Back in the 1990s communities where scared for juvenile delinquency to development so they came to conclusion that the harsher programs were, the better. They had slogans such as get tough on crime and adult time for adult crime. They created programs such as The Juvenile Boot- camp (juvenile 5 & 6). numerous people believe that the court it just to easy on their verdicts. So who exactly are these juvenile delinquents? What could cause a child to be so unfounded? Researchers found similar characteristics that are found in most juveniles. They expose impulsive behaviors and difficulty showing gratification. Also more(prenominal) than likely to carry out poorly in school or d roop out all together. E sparely in those whose parents do not supervise or put on any discipline or do not communicate. Also parents of juveniles are likely to have committed a crime them selves (Britannica 1 & 2). The bulk of the cases involve males. Female delinquency began to increase in the 1980s in the United States (Britannica 1). Most researchers who study juveniles believe that there is no individual(a) cause.Some study biological factors. Others study how some people hire certain behaviors through social experiences. Sociologist explain that many go into criminal behavior as an adaption to a social environment in which they cant attain their social goals (Britannica 1). Now that you know the facts and some more informationwhat do you think? Should juveniles be trialed as adults? Well I believe that yes they should be. That if they are committing an adult action they should pay for it like an adult. Many argue that children arent aware of what theyre doing. Honestly we s ometimes devalue children and dont really look at what they are open of. For example, Nathaniel Brazill, a 14 year old boy convicted for the murder of his midway school teacher Brazill shot his teacher Barrry Gunrow in the head on the final day of classes (Teen). Who would think that a young boy would do this? Nobody Im guessing, this is clear evidence that we need to pay a adjacent attention to children and not judge them on their age. Another example is, four teenagers, Humberto Guzman, Hassan Mayfield, Denzell Fell and Andrew John male child, ages 13 and 15. They are charge of a killing a student, Broderick J. Henman by chasing him into a car fashion way during a robbery attempt.A witness describes that Broderick was lead way from the robbers. That they held him and punched him on the side of his head. Healso said that they boys had laughed as the car stuck Broderick (Hartocollis 1 &2). This case strongly shows that these children know exactly what they are doing and have the same intentions as adults. So they shouldnt have special treatment, when they act so brutal and awful. Many children who have committed crimes such as rape, robbery assault, murder and attempted murder are lighten from being trialed as an adult because of their age (Wilde 1). Does that seem right to you? A child isnt normal if he/she committed such horrible acts. I think that most or at least part of the blame belongs to parents for their ignorance. I believe they should pay more attention to their children to placement or notice any weird changes in attitudes or behavior. An example of this is, in February 2009 state police found 26 year old Kenzie Hauk in her bed with a bullet straight through her head. She was octette months old pregnant.The murderer was 11 year old Jordan Brown the son of the Fiance (Chen 1).The boy had been jealous of his dads fiance. Does this not grab your attention? This is on the face of it lack of parenting or communication coming from his father. If he were paying closer attention then he couldve spotted that something was going on with his son Now that youve heard a couple of examples I really consent you were able to change perspectives if you did not agree in the first place. Just think how the families of these victims feel? Try putting your self in their places? Wouldnt you want the killer to pay for debt evenly? I know I would. So why not avoid this from happening? Parents watch your children more closely and keep communication between you guys if you start to seem them playacting up. Act fast, before you son or daughter is sitting in the court waiting for his/her verdict.