Is Expanding Nuclear Power Really Beneficial to Society Development Essay

In recent decades, the coal consumption among the unit world has sharply increase so as to couple the rapid development in in all country. As generating electricity by coal is non renewable and environmental unfriendly, people tend to develop renewable muscle like thermo thermo atomic power, wind power, hydropower etc. though the cost of constructing the plants and utilizing is extremely high. Among the renewable faculty mentioned above, thermo thermonuclear power is the intimately popular to expand. atomic power is the employment of nuclear fusion or fission from the reactor to generate electricity. It is super efficient and produces only nuclear waste entirely no carbon emission.Nuclear power seems to be an ideal energy source just now is it that good? In my opinion, nuclear power has too many drawbacks that they surmount its advantages undoubtedly, so I oppose the expanding of nuclear power in our society. The depression reason I oppose is that nuclear reactor is inherently shaky to benignant breeding. The accidents devolveed in Chernobyl and Fukushima has shown us appargonntly that nuclear meltdowns and explosions bunghole materialise at any fourth dimension without any omen. Not only did the accidents suffer destructive damage to the buildings or any infrastructure in the cities, solely also caused hundreds and thousands of casualties.Despite the high technology and secure safety arrangement implemented in the nuclear plant, and despite many scientists and professors claimed the percentage of non getting explosion is up to 90%, accidents can still happen and result in disastrous outcome. Frankly no one can afford the outcome and d be to say it is impossible for that 10% to occur. The most recent disaster in Fukushima once again alerts people from all around the world. As the communication media is well established nowadays, people in every corner of the world can watch this disasternuclear leakage and explosions on live through te levision or Internet. underway nuclear power plants are no longer safe umteen communities from different countries ranted. They also vowed that they would use all means to oppose the expanding of nuclear so as to protect their offspring. Life is precious and anything that poses threats to human life should be halted. Secondly the construction and the maintenance of nuclear plant are exceptionally dear. In fact, the cost of building and doing maintenance is highly qualified on taxpayers handouts. US, one of the countries investing a lot on development nuclear power, has put the cost burden to their citizens since 2005.In 2005, President furnish approved an energy bill that included over 13 one million million USD in tax breaks and subsidies for the nuclear industry. However, nowadays in every country, including those substantial countries, is suffering from the problem of poverty. The poor has difficulties in maintaining their life while the government activity still imposes heavy tax on them and that is unacceptable. On the other hand, since the nuclear plants are built far away from residence, long electrical wires are required to transfer electricity from the plants to our houses.Whenever electricity is transferred through wires, some energy will be lost to surroundings. Thus for a long exceed transfer, much energy would be lost which is definitely uneconomical and inefficient. So please care about the poor. And the third reason that I discord in expanding nuclear power is nuclear waste cannot be dealt adequately. organism generated during the fuel cycle, nuclear waste actually is not a dandy source it is a radioactive substance emitting radiation all the time and it takes millions of years to become harmless, so it poses a severe potential jeopardy to human health.Furthermore, nuclear wastes are usually buried in a designated place where it is far away from residence, so it is required to transport the wastes to these locations. This may pose r isks on the populations that live along the transport route. I am sure nobody wants any nuclear waste is accidentally left in front of their houses. Hence nuclear power should not be developed unless the problem of nuclear waste has been solved. However genuine and cogent the disadvantages are, some proponents still think nuclear power is a perfect(a) energy source.They believe nuclear power helps reduce the emissions and contribute in easing world(a) warming. Nevertheless it is not the case. An ecologist has once stated that nuclear power is not totally emission free because when we examine the whole nuclear power generating cycle, we can see that in mining of uranium, lead the nuclear reactor, transportation of nuclear waste and even the disposal of nuclear waste rely on fossil fuels and produces a lot of greenhouse gases.Therefore there is actually net emission of harmful gases and global warming would not be relieved because of using nuclear power. Although it is chasten f or people to seek for progress and develop new technology to meet their wants, we still need to consider the consequence that expanding new technology brings. Nuclear power, frankly speaking, is much more efficient than the ordinary way of generating electricity, but the outcome of this is disastrous and people cannot afford to losethats human life.Moreover it is very expensive in developing nuclear power, if I am the government I would rather spend this bucket of capital to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. Last but not least, the issue brought by radioactive nuclear waste is very undestroyable which is always threatening our life. Hence unless the above three problems are solved, I am still opposing the development of nuclear power.