Discovery and Hypothesis-based Science Approach Essay

The article, taken from the New York time on March 03, 2009, tackles round the affirm up to(p) reasons for an give riseth in land fires in Ind whizsia. It was a asseverate that tried to defy the common thinking that drought is usually the mother of these fires, and showed several evidences to prove it. Upon reading the whole article and the study itself, one can easily conclude that the scientists personad the disco very(prenominal) approach. The researchers began collecting entropy for the sole reason of gaining a better understanding on the potential causes of land fires.They did non formulate a hypothesis prior to info collection, nor did they think of draught as being the plausible cause. As a matter of particular, their first interpretation of their data is that low levels of rainfall correlates with increase chances of having wild fires. However, the results also show other significant data, on which the scientists leader their bare-assed(a) conclusions from. It is indeed hypothesis based on the experiment already made. The researchers, in order to obtain just results, studied previous crosss and cases of fires from the 1960s to 2006.Aside from obtaining the obvious results regarding the low amount of rainfall, they found out a big difference on fire outbreak on Sumatra and Kalimantan that horizontal though these islands experience the same amount of rainfall, fires became common in Kalimantan besides during the eighties. Further data led to the researchers to hypothesize that the increase of population during the 1980s posed a massive threat to the environment, for the government started to switch to freehanded agri-business, which tends to abuse the land and cause accidental fires.Although the experiment did not use any control groups, I think that their case does not anticipate one at all. The only possible question is whether the data they obtained were as accurate as possible. They mentioned that data obtained after the 1990s w ere from fire-monitoring satellites, scarce those from the sixties to the 1980s were untaintedly from visibility records from airports. These can then be causes of discrepancies, since the mode for data collection is not the same for all. Further more, what may be a fire signal for a fire-monitoring satellite may not be as such in the view from an airport.Aside from these, the report and the scientific approach expected to be do well. They were capable to obtain results that would importantly change mans outlook on the environment. Article 2. possibility and Experiment Meet, and a New Form of Boron Is Found In this article, published in the New York Times last February 4, 2009, a great discovery was mentioned and brought up to the world. It is the isolated or creation of a new kind of boron. This element, as the article explains, have been studied by many another(prenominal) scientist for around 200 years.Several boron compounds have come into existence, but it was only in 19 09 where an almost pure, about 99%, boron was isolated. This then triggered the continuing study to locate other kinds of boron, such as what was done with carbon and hydrogen. In 2004, two researchers were able to produce a new kind of boron, one that is very stable and almost as unenviable as a diamond. It was done on super high pressure, and is very heat resistant and remains its hardness even after removing the pressure.Although the facts seem to state that this is a discovery science, the presence of the history and previous studies bring up this to be a hypothesis-based approach. They knew before hand that it is possible for boron to afford different forms, and that the first three was not as stable as it should be. With this under their belt, they proceeded into interrogatory new variables that would create the super-stable boron. And by altering the pressure, they were able to do that. The experiment was manifestly straight forward, done independently by the researchers only with no sponsors or any product endorsement.It was a simply experiment backed up by hypothetical information and conjecture from previous studies. The experiment was valid, since the product was also tested via several testing ground purposes to confirm its identity as boron. Computer-based crystallography analysis was also done to tolerate the stability of the element. As far as the experimental method and the results, the researchers were able to do a perfectly valid scientific experiment. Article 3. From dozens of Manure, a Growth Industry This final article, also from the New York Times newspaper, was published on March 1, 2009.It is about how two researchers were able to convert their farm cow manure into something more efficient and useful. The whole throw away took about 8 years, and a $72,000 grant from the Agricultural Business bunch up for the Cowpots to be born. These are flower seeding pots made directly from the manure of cows. Today, the manufacture has bloomed to its fullest, being able to produce several pots and attaining the interest of many costumers. As suggested by the facts and figures above, the researchers used a hypothesis-based scientific approach in this upchuck.The mere fact that a grant was given means that a design was submitted to the grantor. It is then possible that within this proposal, the proponents of the project already outlined their possible hypothesis and even the methodology to attain answers to their problem. It is then a pre-planned idea, which began with a question and a hypothesis. Although the paper did not specify the exact procedure undertaken by the researchers in creating the Cowpots, the process seemed to be a combination of attempt and error testing on the products ability to grow plants.It is then possible that a company, particularly those that are from or attached in any way to the Agricultural Business Cluster, could benefit from the project itself. But nothing was explicitly said on t he paper. In improver to this, the study also used control groups, particularly in testing their pots. They mentioned of side-by-side comparison with normal seeding pots. These are entirely valid, and are in fact a great way to test the effectiveness of their product. Works Cited whole articles were obtained from the New York Times Newspapers dated March 03, 2009, February 4, 2009 and March 1, 2009.